By: Abdullah Saeed Al Habsi
The UAE has announced the results of the international Operation “Ghost Hunt” against fraud, carried out with the participation of thirty countries, thirteen private-sector entities, and two international organizations. The announced results showed the thwarting of more than 123 million fraud attempts, the arrest of more than 960 people, and the uncovering of funds and assets valued at over $39 billion. These are numbers worth noting, but their deeper value lies not simply in their scale; it lies in the question they pose to governments and institutions: Why do we still treat digital fraud as though it were a crime that occurs within the borders of a single state?
Digital Fraud Is a Crime That Crosses Borders
The modern fraudster does not need to cross a border checkpoint. They can set up a fake business front in one country, run communications from a second, receive money through accounts in a third, and then transfer it within minutes along pathways that are difficult to trace. As for the victim, they might be an employee receiving a message that appears to come from their manager, a small business owner who agrees to transfer payments to an account whose details have changed, or a family fearing the loss of their savings. In these cases, the efficiency of local police alone is not enough if the parts of the crime are distributed across multiple judicial, technical, and financial systems.
From Chasing Crime to Preventing It
This is why I believe the most important message in the Emirati operation is the shift from cooperation that begins after a crime takes place to cooperation that operates while it is taking shape. When the competent authorities are able to quickly exchange indicators and warnings, they have a chance to disable suspicious accounts, halt transfers, or alert users before the fraud turns into a permanent loss. This does not mean that every thwarted attempt would have succeeded, nor that every uncovered asset has been recovered. But it does mean that security metrics must not be limited to the number of people arrested, but should include the amount of damage that was prevented.
Partnership Between Governments and the Private Sector
There is another lesson concerning the private sector. Banks, telecommunications companies, and digital platforms are not merely entities that provide data after an official request arrives. They see different parts of fraudulent behavior: unusual financial movement, waves of similar messages, accounts that are created and then disappear, or impersonation patterns that repeat across markets. If these signals remain isolated, each incident may look small and ordinary. Bringing them together according to clear legal rules, however, can uncover a larger network before it expands. The challenge is to build a practical partnership that protects privacy and does not turn the fight against fraud into a justification for boundless data sharing.
The Groups Most Vulnerable to Digital Fraud
In the Arab world, there is a particular need to protect groups that do not have dedicated cybersecurity teams. Small businesses, the elderly, job seekers, and individuals using digital financial services for the first time may be more vulnerable to persuasive messages, urgency, and impersonation. It is not enough to ask everyone to “be careful.” What is needed is for reporting procedures to be easy, for financial institutions to deal quickly with suspicions, and for the victim to know which authority to turn to without getting lost between the bank, the police, and the electronic platform.
Independent Verification Protects Money
Moreover, awareness alone cannot keep pace with every deception technique. Today, fraudsters can use digital tools to produce convincing voices, images, and messages, and therefore institutions should move away from relying on the appearance of a message or the tone of the caller toward independent verification procedures. If someone asks for an urgent money transfer in the name of an official or relative, having a second channel for verification is not a bureaucratic complication; it is a simple barrier that may prevent a major loss. This principle applies to companies, government departments, and families alike.
Clear Responsibilities and Fast Response
Yet the success of any international partnership also needs clear answers regarding responsibility. Who receives the report first? Who decides to freeze a financial transaction? How is digital evidence preserved so that it is admissible in judicial proceedings in more than one country? And how do we prevent responses from being delayed due to differing working hours or procedures? These are not marginal technical details; they are the difference between cooperation that appears in press releases and cooperation whose impact is felt by the person trying to save their money.
Common Standards to Combat Fraud
I believe the “Ghost Hunt” experience gives countries an opportunity to develop common standards for rapid response, the exchange of reliable indicators, and training on cross-border fraud scenarios. Universities and professional institutions can contribute by studying new patterns and evaluating what succeeds and what needs improvement. Most importantly, they can publish understandable and auditable results, so that the public knows the difference between attempts thwarted, money tracked, assets frozen, and sums returned to their owners.
Protecting People Is the True Measure of Success
A state’s strength in countering fraud is not measured solely by its ability to pursue perpetrators, but by its capacity to make crime more difficult and less profitable, speed up reporting, and restore trust. Since fraud networks have learned to operate across borders, it makes sense for the institutions protecting people to work with the same speed. International cooperation then becomes a daily practice to protect human beings, rather than a headline that appears only after an operation ends.
About the Author: Abdullah Saeed Al Habsi, an Emirati writer and researcher in security, risk management, and organizational leadership, and a Member of the Institute of Leadership (UK).
Latest video
تابع معنا تحليل قراءة الصحف اليومية مع الكاتب الصحفي Hany Sallam عبر